OOS 19-4 - Better off dead? Ecological insights on the efficacy of culling and vaccination of vampire bats for rabies control in Latin America

Wednesday, August 14, 2019: 2:30 PM
M103, Kentucky International Convention Center
Daniel G. Streicker1,2, Kevin M. Bakker2,3, Rachel Abbott4, Julio Benavides2,5, Alice Broos6, Nestor Falcon7, Jorge E Osorio8, Tonie E. Rocke9, Carlos Shiva7, Carlos Tello10, Mafalda Viana11 and Jason Matthiopoulos11, (1)MRC–University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom, (2)Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, (3)Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, (4)USGS National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, WI, (5)Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile, (6)MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, (7)Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru, (8)School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, (9)National Wildlife Health Center, US Geological Survey, Madison, WI, (10)Association for the Conservation and Development of Natural Resources, Lima, Peru, (11)Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
Background/Question/Methods

Outbreaks of lethal viruses in humans including Ebola, Nipah, and SARS have directed global attention towards bats as among the most important and least understood groups of viral reservoirs. As with other zoonotic wildlife pathogens, the economic and health impacts of bat viruses are traditionally mitigated by reactive vaccination and prophylaxis of humans and domestic animals. However, these strategies cannot alter transmission within bats and must be applied indefinitely, at escalating cost and ever-present risk. Controlling pathogens within the bat reservoir would represent a shift towards prevention, but policies implemented without scientific foundation risk unexpected and detrimental outcomes. Vampire bat rabies is a damaging zoonosis that governments across Latin America have sought to contain for over 30 years by culling bats. Our previous work identified potential pitfalls in this strategy, but no empirical studies have quantified whether culling actually reduces the burden of human or livestock rabies. We applied Bayesian state space models to data from an intensive, multi-year bat cull in southern Peru to test whether culling altered bat population dynamics or diminished rabies spillover to livestock. Next, we assessed the potential utility of an alternative ecological lever – self-spreading vaccines – to manage rabies in bats.

Results/Conclusions

Our analysis revealed that culls drastically reduced vampire bat populations over a vast geographic area, providing short-term relief to bat-livestock conflicts. However, culls had negligible effects on the burden of vampire bat rabies in livestock, with long-term disease dynamics instead driven by spatiotemporal processes unrelated to culling. The apparent failure of culls to control rabies implies a perpetually-incurred cost with limited benefits for rabies prevention. In contrast, field experiments and modelling efforts suggested that vaccines that spread autonomously among bats by could dramatically reduce the size, probability, and duration of rabies outbreaks, and we identify several promising recombinant viral vaccine platforms. Strategic vaccination of bats may significantly reduce the burden of rabies in Latin America where decades of culling and livestock immunization have been unable to do so.