2022 ESA Annual Meeting (August 14 - 19)

OOS 16-5 Taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of understorey plants respond differently to environmental conditions in European forest edges

2:30 PM-2:45 PM
524A
Karen De Pauw, Ghent University;Camille Meeussen,University of Ghent;Sanne Govaert,University of Ghent;Pieter Sanczuk,University of Ghent;Thomas Vanneste,University of Ghent;Markus Bernhardt-Roemermann,University of Jena;Kurt Bollmann,Forest, snow and landscape Research WSL;Jörg Brunet,Swedisch University of Agricultural sciences, Alnarp, Sweden;Kim Calders,Department of Environment, Ghent University, Belgium;Sara A.O. Cousins,Stockholm university;Martin Diekmann,Bremen university;Per-Ola Hedwall,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden;Giovanni Iacopetti,University of Florence;Jonathan Lenoir,EDYSAN UMR CNRS 7058, Picardie Jules Verne University, Amiens, France;Sigrid Lindmo,Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway;Anna Orczewska,University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland;;Quentin Ponette,Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la- Neuve, Belgium;Jan Plue,13IVL Swedish Environmental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden;Federico Selvi,University of Florence;Hans Verbeeck,Department of Environment, Ghent University, Belgium;
Background/Question/Methods

Forest biodiversity world-wide is affected by climate change, habitat loss and fragmentation, and today 20% of the forest area is located within 100 m of a forest edge. Still, forest edges harbour a substantial amount of terrestrial biodiversity,especially in the understorey. The functional and phylogenetic diversity of forest edges have never been studied simultaneously at a continental scale, in spite of their importance for the forests' functioning and for communities' resilience to future change.We assessed nine metrics of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of understorey plant communities in 225 plots spread along edge-to-interior gradients in deciduous forests across Europe. We then derived the relative effects and importance of edaphic, stand and landscape conditions on the diversity metrics.

Results/Conclusions

Here, we show that taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity metrics respond differently to environmental conditions. We report an increase in functional diversity in plots with stronger microclimatic buffering, in spite of their lower taxonomic species richness. Additionally, we found increased taxonomic species richness at the forest edge, but in forests with intermediate and high openness, these communities had decreased phylogenetic diversity.Functional and phylogenetic diversity revealed complementary and important insights in community assembly mechanisms. Several environmental filters were identified as potential drivers of the patterns, such as a colder macroclimate and less buffered microclimate for functional diversity. For phylogenetic diversity, edaphic conditions were more important. Interestingly, plots with lower soil pH had decreased taxonomic species richness, but led to increased phylogenetic diversity, challenging the phylogenetic niche conservatism concept.Taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of understorey communities in forest edges respond differently to environmental conditions, providing insight into different community assembly mechanisms and their interactions. Therefore, it is important to look beyond species richness with phylogenetic and functional diversity approaches when focusing on forest understorey biodiversity.