2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

LB 3 Abstract - Improving stream restoration projects: How instream habitat influences recruitment and distribution of aquatic insect populations

Katie Bille, Matthew E. McTammany, Belinda Wan and Katie A. Chase, Biology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA
Background/Question/Methods

Aquatic insects have complex life cycles which often involve interactions with aquatic and terrestrial environments. This complexity presents multiple opportunities for population size to be limited, such as when adult females return to streams to lay their eggs. Oviposition, or egg-laying, can be accomplished in a variety of ways, with some insects exclusively laying their eggs on instream habitat like rocks or organic material. We sought to understand the role of instream habitat on recruitment of aquatic insects to streams and subsequent effects on larval distribution. We also investigated whether the degree to which instream habitat influence on larval distribution varied among insect taxa with different oviposition behaviors. To accomplish this, we constructed nine gravel and cobble riffles in a small central Pennsylvania stream previously lacking coarse inorganic and emergent substrate. These riffles were constructed in sets with different inter-riffle distances (15, 10, or 5 m) to determine if distance to upstream riffle and oviposition habitat affected downstream benthic invertebrate density. Benthic and drift samples were collected directly below each riffle and set of riffles every two weeks from September-October 2019. Riffles were also sampled for aquatic insect eggs, which were reared to adulthood in the lab.

Results/Conclusions

Initial results suggest that addition of emergent substrate increased insect recruitment to our stream, as 88% of egg masses were found on emergent rocks in riffles compared to 12% of egg masses on fully submerged rocks. Egg masses from Hydropsyche sp. (Trichoptera) and Chironomidae (Diptera) were found on both types of substrate, while Baetis sp. (Ephemeroptera) egg masses were only found on emergent rocks, which suggests that recruitment of taxa with selective oviposition behaviors could be limited by availability of emergent rock substrate. Additionally, larval insect densities were higher in reaches with riffles spaced 5 m apart (276.3 +/- 29.6) than in the control reach upstream of the constructed riffles (mean 113.7 +/- 7.6; ANOVA with Tukey’s pairwise comparison, p < 0.05).” This study increased our knowledge of insect oviposition behavior and showed that providing oviposition and riffle habitat for aquatic insect taxa could improve recolonization and ecological recovery following restoration of habitat-limited streams. We suggest strategic riffle addition, including emergent substrate, as an augmentation of conventional structural restoration practices in streams.