2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

COS 112 Abstract - Species richness impacts total soil carbon more than 19 years of CO2 enrichment or soil nitrogen addition

Melissa A. Pastore, Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, Sarah E. Hobbie, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, Kally Worm, Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN and Peter B. Reich, Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, Australia
Background/Question/Methods

Whether the terrestrial biosphere will continue to act as a net carbon (C) sink in the face of multiple global changes is questionable. Part of this uncertainty is related to whether increases in plant C fixation commonly observed under elevated CO2 (eCO2) in short-term studies will translate into long-term (i.e., decades or more) C storage and whether this depends on soil nitrogen (N) supply and/or species richness. In this study, we investigated how manipulations of CO2 (ambient and +180 ppm), soil N supply (ambient and +4 g N m-2 y-1), and plant species richness (1, 4, 9, or 16 species) have influenced total ecosystem (soil + plant) C storage over 19 years (1998-2016) in a Minnesota grassland with sandy, nutrient-poor soils. To do so, we used long-term biomass, root ingrowth, and plant tissue chemistry data coupled with measurements of total soil C (to a depth of 60 cm) in a free-air CO2 enrichment experiment (BioCON).

Results/Conclusions

Species richness impacted total ecosystem C more than CO2 or N treatments over 19 years. On average, increasing species richness from 1 to 16 enhanced total ecosystem C storage by 1111 g C m-2 y-1 (+24%), whereas enriched N modestly increased total ecosystem C by 181 g C m-2 y-1 (+4%) and eCO2 tended to increase total ecosystem C by 129 g C m-2 y-1 (+3%). CO2 effects on total ecosystem C were greater for particular combinations of species richness with year or N level, but were neither consistent nor as strong as the main effect of species richness. Patterns in total ecosystem C were driven by the soil C pool, which made up 90% of total ecosystem C, whereas total plant C contributed the remaining 10%. Though eCO2 stimulated total net primary productivity by 16% on average, enhanced C losses via soil respiration under eCO2 likely offset any increases in plant-derived soil C inputs. Our results suggest that increases in plant productivity under eCO2 may not translate into long-term C storage if the additional C released into soils is labile and decomposes quickly. This calls into question whether eCO2 will increase the soil C sink in these grassland ecosystems and thereby help to slow climate change. Overall, our results suggest that species richness may influence grassland C storage more than rising CO2 or soil N supply.