2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

PS 48 Abstract - Improvements in daymet continental-scale gridded daily temperature and precipitation estimates

Michele Thornton1, Rupesh Shrestha2, Peter E. Thornton3, Shih-Chieh Kao4, Yaxing Wei1 and Bruce E. Wilson4, (1)Environmental Sciences Division & Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, (2)Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, (3)Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, (4)Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
Background/Question/Methods

We evaluated temperature and precipitation bias in surface gauge data and are advancing methodologies to address data fusion techniques to improve precipitation occurrence in Daymet.

Daymet provides high-resolution daily gridded weather parameters for the entire North American spatial extent for the time period 1980 – 2019 (https://daymet.ornl.gov/). Daymet uses gauge data from multiple surface weather observation networks compiled from the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) Daily. Combined with digital elevation data and a three-dimensional gradient estimation method, Daymet estimates continuous surfaces of minimum and maximum temperature and precipitation occurrence and amount. Some stations suffer from a “time-of-day reporting bias”, wherein stations with daily reporting times earlier than mid-day are actually reporting the maximum temperature (Tmax) observed from the previous day. Likewise, the time of observation for precipitation events results in daily occurrence bias. In addition, we will show methodologies to prepare precipitation datasets from gauge data, NCEP Stage IV QPE, and IMERG from NASA’s Global Precipitation Measurements (GPM) mission in which we hypothesize that data fusion techniques should improve the estimation of the distribution of precipitation patterns especially in high latitude areas where station networks are sparse.

Results/Conclusions

We used cross-validation analysis to demonstrate that shifting the recorded Tmax for these stations back by one day significantly reduced the mean prediction errors for Tmax. We applied the same logic to the daily total precipitation records and explored several alternatives for how to redistribute precipitation amounts. It was found that shifting the entire daily amount back by one day for stations with reporting times earlier than noon reduced prediction errors while maintaining observed daily event size frequency distributions. The precipitation shifting logic was evaluated with a regression analysis using hourly NCEP Stage IV radar data. It was shown that this method is effective in identifying and correcting biases in the timing of daily events. These improvements will be available in late summer 2020 in a new dataset release of Daymet V4 daily meteorological data for North America for year 1980 – present. The results of the methodologies toward data fusion in precipitation data products show progress toward fulfilling the need for improved high-resolution estimates of daily gridded weather data across North America.