2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

COS 167 Abstract - Increasing risk of fire-catalyzed change in ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir forests

Kimberley T. Davis1, Philip Higuera1, Solomon Dobrowski2, Sean Parks3 and John Abatzoglou4, (1)Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, (2)W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, (3)Rocky Mountain Research Station, US Forest Service, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Missoula, MT, (4)2Management of Complex Systems, University of California, Merced, CA
Background/Question/Methods

Climate change is causing an increase in annual area burned in western US forests. Combined with hot and dry post-fire conditions, these changes may overcome the resilience mechanisms of fire-prone forests, resulting in ecosystem transitions or “fire-catalyzed change.” To quantify the potential for fire-catalyzed change, it is necessary to consider the combined likelihood of high-severity fire and the potential for climate to limit post-fire regeneration. Here we combined predictions of post-fire tree recruitment with existing projections of the likelihood of stand-replacing fire to quantify the vulnerability of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir forests to fire-catalyzed change. We used a dataset of annually resolved establishment dates for 1847 ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir juveniles that regenerated following 26 fires in the US Intermountain West to model annual recruitment as a function of bioclimatic variables. We used this model to predict the probability of post-fire ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir recruitment for three decades (1980s, 2000s, and a +2°C warmer decade representing the future). We calculated the proportion of each intermountain ecoregion vulnerable to fire-catalyzed change by identifying where the probability of stand-replacing severity, if a fire were to occur, was high, and the probability of post-fire recruitment was low.

Results/Conclusions

Post-fire seedling recruitment had a nonlinear negative relationship with maximum temperature, vapor pressure deficit, and climatic water deficit. Across all intermountain ecoregions, 20% and 14% of the range of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir, respectively, had climate conditions unsuitable for recruitment in the 1980s. These values increased to 31% and 19% in the 2000s, and 57% and 38% under the future climate scenario for ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir, respectively. Across all time periods, southern ecoregions had considerably lower climate suitability for post-fire recruitment than northern ecoregions. Vulnerability to fire-catalyzed change increased over time. Across the study region, 5.6% and 4.6% of the area was vulnerable to fire-catalyzed change in the 1980s, for ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir, respectively. These numbers increased to 14.1% (ponderosa pine) and 10.6% (Douglas-fir) under the future climate scenario. Our results suggest that over 10% of the range of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir in the Intermountain West is vulnerable to fire-catalyzed change, given the likelihood of high-severity fire combined with the impacts of climate on post-fire tree regeneration. As fires continue to burn more area under climate change, post-fire recruitment failures due to warm and dry conditions will increasingly cause vegetation shifts in ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir forests.