2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

COS 36 Abstract - To Sedum or not to Sedum: Evaluating Sedum relative to non-Sedum performance on extensive green roofs

Chih Julie Wang1, J. Scott MacIvor2 and Marc Cadotte1, (1)Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, (2)Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada
Background/Question/Methods

The majority of green roofs consist of Sedum-based plantings (hereafter referred to as Sedum) which are non-native to where they are widely deployed. Sedum has time and again been shown to outperform grasses and wildflowers (hereafter referred to as non-Sedum) in survival and cover on extensive green roofs. However, some studies have found that Sedum is unable to perform green roof functions as well as some non-Sedum plants. The growth in peer-reviewed literature on green roofs in the last few decades has prompted this meta-analysis to assess Sedum relative to non-Sedum performance. Here, we compare the standard effect sizes of Sedum to non-Sedum performances for three criteria on extensive green roofs: i) survival, ii) roof cooling, and iii) stormwater management.

Results/Conclusions

A total of 90 studies out of the 186 studies that were reviewed examined survival, cooling, and/or stormwater management of green roof plants. A large proportion of studies were conducted in North America (46%) and Europe (37%), only 18% were conducted elsewhere. We found that Sedum does survive better than non-Sedum on extensive green roofs, but there was no pattern in roof cooling and stormwater management. A lack of consistent metrics and methodologies when measuring green roof functioning is what future researchers and industries can work together to standardize.