2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

COS 143 Abstract - Data informed adaptive management in agriculture

Paul Hegedus, Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University and Bruce Maxwell, Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT
Background/Question/Methods

Large amounts of on-farm and remotely sensed data can transform agriculture through implementation of adaptive management. The site, time, and history specificity of fields has complicated integration of ecological principles into an agriculture focused on regionwide prescriptions. Crop managers now have the ability to generate field-specific management plans using field-specific data to optimize inputs based on pollution minimization and profit maximization. For example, traditional nitrogen (N) fertilizer management consisted of applying a uniform rate, causing N inefficiencies and non-point nitrate pollution. Precision agriculture technologies provide an empirical approach to adaptive management. This research seeks to identify spatiotemporal drivers of variation in production (grain yield), quality (grain protein), and net-returns for Northern Great Plains small-grain agroecosystems and evaluates their relatedness and consistency between fields. Winter-wheat yield and protein, and as-applied N data have been collected from fields, along with remotely sensed topographic, weather, and historical vegetation index data, to evaluate the spatial variation in production, quality, and net-returns for wheat across years. For four fields, generalized additive models were used to fit residuals of production, quality, and net-return as a function of as-applied N, topographic variables, weather, soil moisture, soil type, and prior productivity (NDVI up to two years prior).

Results/Conclusions

Regardless of management, every field experienced variation in production, quality, and net-returns across a field for a given year and across years for given points in fields. While in most fields, as-applied nitrogen was expected to be the major source of variation in crop responses when experimental rates were randomly applied, we have observed that in some cases, there was no crop response across varied nitrogen rates, indicating that the influence of prior management can negate the effects of current management. In years that uniform nitrogen rates were applied, the spatial variation in production and quality is driven by variables such as elevation, slope, aspect, or topographic position index, however across time, weather, such as precipitation and growing degree days, are the major temporal driver of variation in average production. Understanding the primary sources of field-specific variation in production and quality across the field and over time enables producers to identify if, when, and where nitrogen fertilizer should be applied. Equally important, the spatial and temporal resolution at which variability in agroecosystem performance can be detected creates a mechanism to monitor and ground-truth ecosystem response to global change.