2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

COS 179 Abstract - Tipping points in the adoption of diversified agroecological practices

Melissa Chapman1, Serge Wiltshire1, Claire Kremen1,2, Timothy M. Bowles1, Liz Carlisle3, Daniel Karp4, Alastair Iles1, Patrick Baur1, Fredrico Castillo1, Kathryn DeMaster5, Kenzo Esquivel1, David Gonthier6, Jeffrey Liebert7, Elissa M. Olimpi8, Joanna Ory1, Amber R. Sciligo9, Jennifer Thompson1 and Carl Boettiger1, (1)Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, (2)Institute of Resources, Environment and Sustainability, Dept. of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (3)Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, (4)Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, (5)Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, (6)Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, (7)School of Integrated Plant Science, Cornell University, (8)Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, (9)The Organic Center, Washington, DC
Background/Question/Methods

Both ecological and social systems have been observed to change states abruptly as the result of crossing some critical threshold. Theories of ecological multistability have long described this phenomenon and explored how ecological management impacts stability landscapes, but with underlying tipping dynamics assumed to stem from ecological processes. Similarly, examples from social science suggest that tipping points may result from complex features of human systems, from the collapse of societies to social networks dynamics such as the spread of innovations. Despite widespread interest in the causes and location of tipping points in integrated socio-ecological systems, it has generally been assumed that the underlying dynamical complexity must be ascribed either to social process or natural phenomena alone. Using a Markov Decision Process to represent forward looking decision making in a stochastic ecological environment, we explore how rates of ecological processes, in particular ecosystem service build up, interact with decision making processes to result in long term multistable trajectories of adoption of diversified agroecological practices. We then leverage a large-scale empirical study of adoption of diversified agroecological practices across California, Oregon, and Washington as a comparison to our simulated results.

Results/Conclusions

Temporal feedbacks between a farmer's investment choice based on their perceived utility over a given time horizon and probabilistic changes in the ecological services derived from the environment can result in alternate stable states. Because benefits of ecosystem services take time to accrue, farmers in environments with degraded land are unlikely to invest in diversified agroecological practices, while farmers who benefit from ecosystem services are more likely to bolster those services further through choices of such practices. This path dependency leads to a bifurcation into either a more-simplified (conventional) or more-diversified (agroecological) farming approach, which echoes empirical findings. We show that these alternate stable states need not be an inherent feature of either ecological or decision dynamics but can emerge as a general pattern by dynamically coupling a simple ecosystem model with a rational decision process over time. We suggest that a better understanding of such tipping points has important implications for agricultural and land use policy design across a range of domains, including land tenure and agricultural subsidies.