2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

COS 147 Abstract - Interactive global change impacts on Amazon biogeochemical cycles

Fiona Soper1, Kristofer R. Covey2, Sunitha Pangala3, Angelo Bernadino4, Zoe Pagliaro5, Luana Basso6, Henrique Cassol6, Phillip Fearnside7, Sidney Novoa8, Henrique Sawakuchi9, Thomas Lovejoy10, Jose Marengo11, Carlos Peres12, Paula Bernasconi13, Gabriella Nardoto14, Ismael Nobre15, Rita Mesquita16, Flavia Pinto17, Bruce Hoffman18, Carolina Freitas7, Ricardo Assis Mello19, Alexis Bahl20, Alexis Elmore20 and Jonathon Baillie20, (1)Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, (2)Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, (3)University of Lancaster, United Kingdom, (4)Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Brazil, (5)Skidmore College, (6)National Institute for Space Research, Brazil, (7)Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Brazil, (8)Asociación para la Conservación de la Cuenca Amazónica, Peru, (9)Linköping University, Sweden, (10)George Mason University & Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, (11)Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (CEMADEN), Brazil, (12)School Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom, (13)Instituto Centro de Vida (ICV), Brazil, (14)Universidade de Brasília, Brazil, (15)Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil, (16)Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Institute Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil, (17)The Nature Conservancy, Brazil, (18)The Amazon Conservation Team, Suriname, (19)WWF, Brazil, (20)National Geographic Society
Background/Question/Methods

The Amazon basin is at the center of an intensifying conversation about multiple anthropogenic impacts, both direct (e.g. land use change) and indirect (climate and hydrologic change). Thus far, research has focused primarily on the cycling and storage of carbon (C) and its implications for global climate. Missing is a holistic consideration of the interactions between these anthropogenic impacts and the full suite of significant climate forcing agents originating in the basin, including other greenhouse gases (methane and nitrous oxide), biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs), black C, transpiration and albedo. Doing so is complicated by the very large variation in biophysical, ecological, cultural and political factors across the large area of the basin. Here, we synthesize the current understanding of 1) the nature, extent, rates and drivers of all major anthropogenic changes, and 2) their expected magnitude and direction of effect on each major climate forcing agent. The studied anthropogenic impacts span a range of scales and include deforestation, agricultural conversion, hydrologic and climatic regime change, reservoir construction, fire, mining/oil extraction, hunting, severe storms and others. We identify key knowledge gaps and identify likely impacts on the net climate forcing effect of the Amazon region.

Results/Conclusions

We conclude that the current net positive radiative forcing of non-CO2 agents in the Amazon (in particular methane, nitrous oxide and black C) is likely be equal to or greater than the more often considered CO2 climate impact. If unchecked, the majority of anthropogenic change agents are likely to further increase net radiative forcing from the region, both by reducing C uptake and increasing emission of other agents. Most significant rate and response uncertainties are associated with 1) methane production in seasonally inundated areas and effects of temperature and hydrologic change 2) patterns and radiative forcing impacts of BVOCs and 3) impacts of spatially and temporally variable phenomena such as severe storms and 4) biogeochemical and ecological resiliency of freshwater systems. Given the large contribution of these less-recognized forcing agents, a continuing focus on a single metric of climate service is incompatible with genuine efforts to understand and manage the biogeochemistry of climate in a rapidly changing Amazon.