2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

OOS 21 Abstract - Biotic determinants of semi-arid grassland sensitivity to extreme drought differ across hierarchical scales

Melinda Smith1, Ava Hoffman2, Robert J. Griffin-Nolan3, Anping Chen4, Lauren E. Baur5, Kate Wilkins1, Scott Collins5 and Alan Knapp1, (1)Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, (2)Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, (3)Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, (4)Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, (5)Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Background/Question/Methods

Semi-arid grasslands are expected to be either highly sensitive or insensitive to extreme drought when compared to other ecosystems. High sensitivity is expected based on the Huxman-Smith model which predicts that ecosystems with lower mean annual precipitation should be most responsive to variation in precipitation. In contrast, low sensitivity is predicted because plants in semi-arid ecosystems have evolved under high water stress, and thus should be less sensitive to drought than plants in more mesic ecosystems. We tested these predictions with a four-year extreme drought experiment imposed simultaneously in four semi-arid grasslands of the US: desert grassland in NM (SBK), shortgrass steppe in NM and CO (SBL and SGS, respectively), and northern mixed grass prairie in WY (CHY). We found that as predicted by the Huxman-Smith model these grasslands exhibited relatively high sensitivity to extreme drought, but that sensitivity varied considerably with the SBK site the most and the CHY site least sensitive. We assessed potential biotic mechanisms that may determine this differential sensitivity across hierarchical scales: 1) functional group differences (C4 vs C3), 2) interspecific differences in physiological drought adaptation of congeneric species, and 3) intraspecific differences in physiological adaptation of conspecific populations caused by genotypic variation.

Results/Conclusions

For sites with different dominant physiological pathways (CHY vs. SGS), we found that the CHY was least sensitive to extreme drought due to a greater abundance of C3 grasses that were less responsive to drought when compared to C4 grasses at SGS. For sites with congeneric species (SBK and SBL), we found that Bouteloua eripoda was more sensitive to drought than its congener, B. gracilis, due to a lower hydraulic safety margin. Finally, for sites with different conspecific populations, we found that the genetically distinct B. gracilis population at SBL had a lower hydraulic safety margin than the genetic distinct population at SGS, resulting in greater sensitivity of the SBL population to extreme drought. Overall, our results suggest that differential sensitivity of semi-arid grasslands can result from a hierarchy of biotic mechanisms, ranging from the community to the genetic level.