2020 ESA Annual Meeting (August 3 - 6)

OOS 45 Abstract - The recent past and promising future for data integration methods to estimate species' distributions

Krishna Pacifici, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, David A.W. Miller, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Penn State University, PA, Brian Reich, Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC and Brent S Pease, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Background/Question/Methods

With the advance of methods for estimating species distribution models has come an interest in how to best combine datasets to improve estimates of species distributions. This has spurred the development of data integration methods that simultaneously harness information from multiple datasets while dealing with the specific strengths and weaknesses of each dataset. We outline the general principles that have guided data integration methods and review recent developments in the field of integrated species distribution modeling (ISDM). We then focus specifically on challenges which occur when fusing multiple data sources, including misalignment of spatial and/or temporal resolutions of data. This occurs when data sources have fluctuating geographic coverage, varying spatial scales and resolutions, and differing sources of bias and sparsity. We examine the issue of misaligned data and provide a general solution in the context of ISDMs.

Results/Conclusions

We leverage spatial correlation and repeat observations at multiple scales to make statistically valid predictions at the ecologically relevant scale of inference. An added feature of the approach is that addressing differences in spatial resolution between data sets can allow for the evaluation and calibration of lesser‐quality sources in many instances. Using both simulations and data examples, we highlight the utility of this modeling approach and the consequences of not reconciling misaligned spatial data. We conclude with a brief discussion of the upcoming challenges and obstacles for species distribution modeling via data fusion.