COS 73-2 - Large-scale forest restoration stabilizes carbon under climate change in Southwest U.S

Thursday, August 15, 2019: 8:20 AM
M105/106, Kentucky International Convention Center
Lisa A. McCauley1, Marcos D. Robles1, Travis Woolley2, Rob Marshall1, Alec M. Kretchun3 and David F. Gori4, (1)The Nature Conservancy, Tucson, AZ, (2)The Nature Conservancy, Flagstaff, AZ, (3)Quantum Spatial, Portland, OR, (4)School of Natural Resources & the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Background/Question/Methods

Higher tree density, more fuels, and a warmer, drier climate have caused an increase in the frequency, size, and severity of wildfires in Western U.S. forests. There is an urgent need to restore forests across the western U.S. To address this need, the U.S. Forest Service began the Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) to restore four national forests in Arizona. The objective of this study was to evaluate how restoration of ~400,000 ha under the 4FRI program and projected climate change would influence carbon dynamics and wildfire severity from 2010 to 2099. Specifically, we estimated forest carbon fluxes, carbon pools and wildfire severity under a moderate and fast 4FRI implementation schedule and compared those to status quo and no harvest scenarios using the LANDIS-II simulation model and four projections of climate change.

Results/Conclusions

We found that the fast-4FRI scenario showed early decreases in ecosystem carbon due to initial thinning/prescribed fire treatments, but total carbon storage increased by 11 – 20% over no harvest by the end of the simulation. This increased carbon storage by 8 – 14 million metric tons, depending on the climate model, equating to removal of carbon emissions from 67,000 – 123,000 passenger vehicles per year until the end of the century. Nearly half of the additional carbon was stored in more stable soil pools. However, climate models with the largest predicted temperature increases showed declines by late century in ecosystem carbon despite restoration. We estimated that ~40% of the harvested carbon, up to 1.5 million metrics tons, will remain sequestered in wood products throughout the simulation period. Our study uses data from a real-world, large-scale restoration project and indicates that restoration is likely to stabilize carbon and the benefits are greater when the pace of restoration is faster.