PS 22-52 - Evaluating the simulated mean soil carbon transit times by earth system models using observations

Tuesday, August 13, 2019
Exhibit Hall, Kentucky International Convention Center
Jing Wang1, Jianyang Xia2, Xuhui Zhou2, Kun Huang3, Jian Zhou4, Yuanyuan Huang5, Lifen Jiang6, Xia Xu7, Junyi Liang8, Ying-Ping Wang9, Xiaoli Cheng10 and Yiqi Luo11, (1)School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, China, (2)School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, (3)East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, (4)East China Normal University, (5)Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif‐sur‐Yvette, France., (6)Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, (7)Nanjing Forestry University, (8)Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, (9)CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Victoria 3195, Australia, (10)Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Garden,CAS, Wuhan 430074,China, (11)Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ
Background/Question/Methods

One known bias in current Earth System Models (ESMs) is the underestimation of global mean soil carbon (C) transit time (τsoil), which quantifies the age of the C atoms at the time they leave the soil. However, it remains unclear where such underestimations are located globally. Here, we constructed a global database of measured τsoil across 187 sites to evaluated results from twelve ESMs.

Results/Conclusions

The observations showed that the estimated τsoil was dramatically shorter from the soil incubations studies in the laboratory environment (Median = 4 years; interquartile range = 1 to 25 years) than that derived from field in-situ measurements (31; 5 to 84 years) with the shifts of stable isotopic C (13C) or the stock-over-flux approach. In comparison with the field observations, the multi-model ensemble simulated a shorter median (19 years) and a smaller spatial variation (6 to 29 years) of τsoil across the same site locations. We then found a significant and negative linear correlation between the in-situ measured τsoil and mean annual air temperature. The underestimations of modeled τsoil are mainly located in cold and dry biomes, especially tundra and desert. Furthermore, we showed that one ESM (i.e., CESM) has improved its τsoil estimate by incorporation of the soil vertical profile. These findings indicate that the spatial variation of τsoil is a useful benchmark for ESMs, and we recommend more observations and modeling efforts on soil C dynamics in regions limited by temperature and moisture.