OOS 7-4 - Social-ecological drivers of change in urban forest patches

Tuesday, August 13, 2019: 9:00 AM
M104, Kentucky International Convention Center
Lea R. Johnson1, Michelle L. Johnson2, Myla FJ Aronson3, Ashley Bowers4, Lindsay K. Campbell2, Megan E. Carr5, Mysha Clarke6, Vincent D'Amico III7, Lindsay Darling8, Tedward Erker9, Robert Fahey10, Kristen King11, Katherine Lautar12, Dexter Locke13, Ted Martello14, Anita T. Morzillo10, Stephanie Pincetl15, Luke Rhodes16, John Paul Schmit17 and Lydia Scott18, (1)Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, (2)Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, (3)Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, (4)TreeBaltimore, Baltimore, MD, (5)Plant Science & Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, (6)School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, (7)Northern Research Station, Baltimore Urban Field Station, USDA Forest Service, Baltimore, MD, (8)Chicago Region Trees Initiative, The Morton Aboretum, Lisle, IL, (9)Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, (10)Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, (11)Forestry, Horticulture & Natural Resources, NYC Parks, Long Island City, NY, (12)Baltimore Greenspace, Baltimore, MD, (13)National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), Baltimore, MD, (14)Tree Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, (15)Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, (16)Fairmont Park Conservancy, Philadelphia, PA, (17)National Capital Region Inventory and Monitoring Network, Office of Natural Resources and Science, US National Park Service, Washington, DC, (18)Chicago Region Trees Initiative, The Morton Arboretum, Chicago, IL
Background/Question/Methods

In cities, patches of remnant and regenerating forest are hotspots of biodiversity that provide both social and ecological benefits. In addition to biogeophysical conditions that affect rural forests, urban forest patches are also subject to social influences on their composition, condition, and functions. Therefore, there is a need for multi-scale studies that compare trends in forest biodiversity among cities while also considering social context of forest patches. We have convened a group of ecological and social scientists and urban land managers to develop a framework for drivers of change in this dynamic system, and to synthesize long-term data describing both social and ecological change in five metropolitan areas of the United States: Baltimore, Washington DC, Chicago, New York and Philadelphia. To empirically expand this framework, we are integrating remotely sensed data and extensive field measurements to identify changes in the composition and condition of urban forest patches over time and across urban-to-rural gradients. Socioeconomic and housing data, management and stewardship datasets, and manager knowledge are also being used to understand management approaches to forest condition, and how management and stewardship affect the composition and condition of forest communities.

Results/Conclusions

We will present a preliminary framework for drivers of change over time urban forest patches, informed by perspectives from urban, landscape, and forest ecology, social science, civic stewardship, and land management decision-making. Our conceptual framework envisions urban forest patches as the center of socio-ecological systems. Results will be applicable not only to our five study cities, whose managers and stewards serve a combined population of more than 12 million people, but also to municipalities that face similar challenges.