2018 ESA Annual Meeting (August 5 -- 10)

COS 83-5 - Factors affecting the recovery trajectory of a pine-oak community after wildfire

Wednesday, August 8, 2018: 2:50 PM
340-341, New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center
Norma Fowler, Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Emily M. Booth, Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA and Greg Creacy, State Parks Division, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Bastrop, TX
Background/Question/Methods

The Lost Pines region in central Texas has the westernmost stands of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) in the United States. In September 2011, during a record drought, a wildfire in this region killed or top-killed almost all of the trees and consumed most understory vegetation. We investigated the effects of soil type, burn severity, and canopy cover on post-fire plant assemblages, focusing on herbaceous diversity and on three woody species that were abundant before the fire: loblolly pine, sand post oak (Quercus margaretta), and yaupon (Ilex vomitoria). Fifty-six plots within the Park were surveyed using protocols from the National Park Service Fire Monitoring Handbook (FMH) between 1999 and 2015.

Results/Conclusions

Oaks re-sprouted vigorously, especially in severely-burned plots, creating a strong pre-fire legacy effect. Loblolly pine, which recruits only from seed, initially had poor recruitment post-fire, so that for several years after the fire it appeared that oaks would replace pines in this community. However, in 2015 a large loblolly pine recruitment event occurred following a year of unusually high precipitation, deflecting the recovery trajectory back towards a composition closer to the pre-fire community composition. Yaupon re-sprouted well in all burn severity classes and appeared likely to eventually re-form the dense mid-story that it had created pre-fire, unless management practices to prevent this are adopted. Herbaceous understory species were much more abundant and diverse post-fire than pre-fire; whether this remains true will likely depend on whether future management practices maintain a relatively open canopy or allow a closed canopy to re-form.