2018 ESA Annual Meeting (August 5 -- 10)

COS 50-4 - How does light affect the relationship between symbiotic nitrogen fixation and plant carbon flux?

Tuesday, August 7, 2018: 2:30 PM
R05, New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center
Palani Akana1, Thomas A. Bytnerowicz1, Kevin L. Griffin2 and Duncan Menge1, (1)Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, (2)Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY
Background/Question/Methods

Symbiotic nitrogen (N) fixation is a major input of N to ecosystems, but it is energetically intensive. Theory suggests that low light should inhibit symbiotic N fixation, which may explain the exclusion of N-fixing trees from low-light understories of mature temperate forests. N-fixing trees provide symbiotic bacteria with a carbon food source, giving them the energy necessary to fix atmospheric N into plant-available form. Rates of symbiotic N fixation, therefore, should depend on the availability of labile carbon within a plant, which is produced through photosynthesis. We hypothesized that N-fixing tree seedlings exposed to a reduction in light intensity would decrease photosynthesis and N fixation rates. To test this, we decreased day-time light availability in potted seedlings of the temperate N-fixing tree Robinia pseudoacacia. To calculate relative N fixation rates, we conducted non-destructive, weekly measurements of nitrogenase activity within entire seedlings using Acetylene Reduction Assays by Cavity-ring down Absorption Spectroscopy (ARACAS), and we tracked changes in N fixation rates of individual seedlings over time. Whole plant carbon flux data were also collected weekly for the same seedlings, and we compared nitrogenase activity and net photosynthesis.

Results/Conclusions

Robinia pseudoacacia seedlings exhibited variable responses to a decrease in day-time light availability. Some seedlings decreased N fixation from an average of 21.0 to <1.0 µg N fixed plant-1 hr-1 within 5 weeks, consistent with the expectation that a decrease in carbon supply would inhibit N fixation. Other seedlings, however, increased N fixation over the same 5-week period from an average of 25.7 to 39.8 µg N fixed plant-1 hr-1. The seedlings that increased N fixation maintained high rates of photosynthesis and used fixed N to increase leaf area by producing new foliage. As such, net photosynthesis was positively correlated with N fixation across all seedlings (R2 = 0.70, p < 0.01). We speculate that seedlings are able to subsidize the N needed in new leaves by trading stored carbohydrates for fixed N, thereby investing in future carbon gain. The ability to use stored carbohydrates to promote N fixation may mean that rates of fixation are regulated by plant demand for future growth rather than by current photosynthetic rates.