2018 ESA Annual Meeting (August 5 -- 10)

COS 63-8 - Experimental sampling design interacts strongly with underlying topologies of ecological interaction networks

Wednesday, August 8, 2018: 10:30 AM
254, New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center
Erica A. Newman, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Lab, US Forest Service, Seattle, WA, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar, Instituto de Física "Gleb Wataghin", Departamento de Física do Estado Sólido e Ciência dos Materiais, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil, Mathias M. Pires, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil, Justin D. Yeakel, School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, David H. Hembry, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; University of Arizona, AZ, Laura Burkle, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, Dominique Gravel, Départment de Biologie, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, Paulo R. Guimaraes Jr., Departamento Ecologia, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, James L. O'Donnell, School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Timothée Poisot, Québec Centre for Biodiversity Sciences, Montréal, QC, Canada and Marie-Josée Fortin, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Background/Question/Methods

The structure of ecological interactions is commonly understood through analyses of interaction networks. However, these analyses may be sensitive to sampling biases in both the interactors (the nodes of the network) and interactions (the links between nodes), because the detectability of species and their interactions is highly heterogeneous. These issues may affect the accuracy of empirically constructed ecological networks. Yet statistical biases introduced by sampling error are difficult to quantify in the absence of full knowledge of the underlying ecological network’s structure.

We explore the properties of several types of large-scale modular networks with predetermined topologies, intended to represent a wide variety of communities that vary in size and types of ecological interactions. We then sampled these networks with different sampling designs that may be employed in field observations. The observed networks generated by each sampling process were then analyzed with respect to the number of components, size of components and other network metrics.

Results/Conclusions

We show that the sampling effort needed to estimate underlying network properties accurately depends both on the sampling design and on the underlying network topology. In particular, networks with random or scale-free modules require more complete sampling to reveal their structure, compared to networks whose modules are nested or bipartite. Overall, the modules with nested structure were the easiest to detect, regardless of sampling design.

Sampling according to species degree (number of interactions) was consistently found to be the most accurate strategy to estimate network structure. Conversely, sampling according to module (representing different interaction types or taxa) results in a rather complete view of certain modules, but fails to provide a complete picture of the underlying network. We recommend that these findings are incorporated into the design and implementation of projects aiming to characterize large networks of species interactions in the field to reduce sampling biases. The software scripts NetGen and NetSampler, developed to construct and sample networks, respectively, are provided for use in further explorations of network structure and comparisons to real interaction networks.