2018 ESA Annual Meeting (August 5 -- 10)

COS 66-8 - When is nectar robbing a commensalism?

Wednesday, August 8, 2018: 10:30 AM
357, New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center
Jacob M. Heiling, Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; Rocky Mountain Biological Labratory, Crested Butte, CO, Trevor Anthony Ledbetter, University of Arizona, Sarah Richman, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, Heather Ellison, Pima Community College, Judith Bronstein, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ and Rebecca E. Irwin, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO
Background/Question/Methods

Nectar robbing, the removal of nectar by a floral visitor through holes pierced in the corolla, is experienced by many plant species bearing hidden or recessed floral nectar. Although robbing can reduce plant reproductive success, many studies fail to find such effects. We outlined three mechanistic hypotheses that can explain when interactions between plants and nectar-robbers should be commensal rather than antagonistic: the non-discrimination (pollinators don’t avoid robbed flowers), visitor prevalence (robber visitation is rare relative to pollinator visitation), and pollen saturation (stigmas receive sufficient pollen to fertilize all ovules with one or very few pollinator visits) hypotheses. We explored these mechanisms in the North American subalpine, bumble bee-pollinated and nectar-robbed plant Corydalis caseana (Fumariaceae). We first confirmed that the effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success were neutral in C. caseana. We then tested the three alternate mechanisms underlying neutral effects using observational studies and experiments.

Results/Conclusions

We found evidence for all three mechanisms. First, consistent with the non-discrimination hypothesis, pollinators did not discriminate against experimentally robbed flowers or inflorescences even though naturally robbed flowers offered significantly lower nectar rewards than unrobbed flowers on average. Second, C. caseana was more commonly visited by pollinators than by nectar robbers, consistent with the visitor prevalence hypothesis. Third, stigmas of virgin (unvisited) flowers as well as those visited once by pollinators were saturated with pollen, with all stigmas bearing pollen loads several orders of magnitude higher than the number of ovules per fruit, consistent with the pollen saturation hypothesis. Our characterization and investigation of the mechanisms driving the commensal outcome of nectar robbing in this system deepens our understanding of the ecology of nectar robbing and contributes to a more general understanding of the variation in the outcomes of interactions between species.