2017 ESA Annual Meeting (August 6 -- 11)

PS 39-108 - Assessing the social and environmental costs of institutional nitrogen footprints

Wednesday, August 9, 2017
Exhibit Hall, Oregon Convention Center
Jana Compton1, Allison M. Leach2, Elizabeth Castner3 and James N. Galloway3, (1)Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Corvallis, OR, (2)Natural Resource and Earth Systems Science and The Sustainability Institute, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, (3)University of Virginia
Background/Question/Methods

Release of N to air, land and water has a host of effects on human health, ecosystems and the economy, many of which scientists and economists are just beginning to develop methods to quantify. In order to understand the broader connections to sustainability, more effort is needed to connect N release to the environment with the impacts on social and economic systems. We estimate the damage costs associated with the institutional nitrogen (N) footprint and explore how this information could be used to create more sustainable institutions. Potential damages associated with the release of NOx and N2O to air and release of N to water were estimated using a cost per unit N approach.

Results/Conclusions

Annual potential damage costs to human health, agriculture and natural ecosystems associated with the N footprint of institutions were $10.5 million USD (2014) at the University of Virginia (UVA) and $3.0 million USD at the University of New Hampshire (UNH). Costs associated with the release of nitrogen oxides (NOx) to human health, in particular the use of coal-derived energy, were the largest component of damage at UVA. At UNH the energy N footprint is much lower because of a co-generation source, and thus the majority of damages were associated with food production. Annual damages associated with release of N from food production were very similar at the two universities ($1.37 vs. $1.66 million at UVA and UNH respectively). These damages also have implications for the extent and scale at which the damages are felt. For example, impacts to human health from energy and transportation are generally larger near the power plants and roads, while impacts from food production can be distant from the campus. Making this information available to institutions can improve their understanding of the damages associated with the different N forms and sources, and inform decisions about campus N reduction strategies.