COS 40-7
Effects of elevated CO2 and growth temperature on respiration rates in Norway spruce seedlings

Tuesday, August 12, 2014: 3:40 PM
Regency Blrm A, Hyatt Regency Hotel
Yulia Kroner, Biology, Western Univeristy, London, ON, Canada
Danielle A. Way, Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Background/Question/Methods

Atmospheric CO2 concentrations are expected to double by the year 2100, leading to temperature increases of 7-10˚C in high latitude, boreal forest regions. Given the role of these forests in the global carbon cycle, we need better understanding of how these climate variables affect photosynthetic carbon gain and carbon loss through respiration in boreal tree species. While much attention has been paid to CO2 and temperature acclimation of photosynthesis, acclimation of respiration, to these drivers has received less attention. While leaf respiration in the dark (Rnight) is easily measured, this rate is inhibited by light, and rates of light respiration (Rday) are often extrapolated from values of Rnight. In our study, we grew Norway spruce (Picea abies) in both ambient and elevated CO2 combined with ambient, +4°C and +8°C growth temperatures, mimicking future climate change scenarios. We then measured the temperature response of both Rday and Rnight from 10-40°C to determine how respiratory fluxes in both the light and the dark acclimate to elevated growth temperatures and CO2 concentrations, compared to current ambient conditions.

Results/Conclusions

Our results show that the ratio of Rday to Rnight increases with rising measurement temperatures. Light inhibition of Rnight was greatest at the lowest measured leaf temperature for all treatments. At 40 ˚C, Rday was higher than Rnight in trees grown at ambient temperatures. Growth temperature had a significant effect on Rnight but not on Rday, with trees grown at higher temperatures showing significantly lower Rnight at a given leaf temperature than ambient temperature-grown trees. Elevated growth CO2 had no strong effect on either Rnight or Rday. We conclude that the effect of growth temperature is much stronger than that of growth CO2 on respiration, and that while we need to account for temperature acclimation of Rnight, Rday may not acclimate strongly to future climate change.