98th ESA Annual Meeting (August 4 -- 9, 2013)

COS 84-9 - Ecological factors, not climate warming, explain variability in treeline patterns

Thursday, August 8, 2013: 10:50 AM
101J, Minneapolis Convention Center
Andrew Trant1, Carissa D. Brown2, David M. Cairns3, Ryan K. Danby4, Andrea H. Lloyd5, Steven D. Mamet6, Ingrid E. Mathisen7, Genevieve Dufour Tremblay8, Xanthe Walker9, Martin Wilmking10, Stéphane Boudreau8, Karen Harper11, Greg H. R. Henry12, Luise Hermanutz13, David Hik14, Annika Hofgaard15, Jill F. Johnstone16, Peter Kershaw17, Colin Laroque18 and Jackie Weir19, (1)School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, (2)Geography, Memorial University, St. John's, NF, Canada, (3)Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, (4)Department of Geography, Queen's University, (5)Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT, (6)Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, (7)Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, (8)Département de Biologie, Université Laval, QC, Canada, (9)Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, (10)Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University Greifwald, Greifwald, Germany, (11)School of Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, (12)Dept of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (13)Department of Biology, Memorial University, St John's, NF, Canada, (14)Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, (15)Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Norway, (16)Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, (17)Department of Geography, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, (18)Department of Geography and Environment, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, Canada, (19)Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, St John's, NF, Canada
Background/Question/Methods

Current vegetation models predict that as climate warms, forests will replace large areas of tundra. However, observed treeline response to climate warming has been highly variable across the alpine and subarctic. Site-level data can provide local-scale information but has limited use for understanding the influence of broad-scale factors (e.g., extent of site warming) in mediating change.

What are the most important climatic and ecological factors influencing treeline variability? Is the extent of site warming useful for predicting treeline response?

We synthesized 25 species-specific case studies from 10 regions across circumpolar treeline. Tree growth form and age structure data from life history stages (seedling, sapling and adult) for each case study were compared between zones across the treeline gradient.  Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) were used to determine what ecological and climate factors are good predictors of treeline growth form and treeline response. 

Results/Conclusions

Growth form relationships for trees could not be explained by the extent of treeline warming, although shifts in growth form across treeline were detected. We showed that ecological factors were better at predicting treeline advance and responses to these factors depended on the life history stage (seedling, sapling or adult trees) of the tree species. We found that the best predictor of whether a treeline would respond positively was treeline form (diffuse or persistent) and how close the treeline was to the ocean. Our findings also suggest that treelines with a propensity for vegetative reproduction were more likely to respond positively. However, direct estimates of climate warming (summer and winter mean temperature, growing degree-days) were not significant in predicting treeline response. Despite the assertion that treeline position is controlled by temperature, ecological factors play a significant role in predicting treeline patterns.

Our results show that ecological factors, in the context of climate change, best explain treeline patterns though continued climate warming will play a significant role in treeline migration.