95th ESA Annual Meeting (August 1 -- 6, 2010)

COS 46-10 - Nutrient management implications of patterns in groundwater chemistry and flow paths in impaired streams

Wednesday, August 4, 2010: 11:10 AM
407, David L Lawrence Convention Center
Paul Mayer1, Edward Doheny2, Barton M. Faulkner3, Kenneth J. Forshay4, Dan Galeone5, Peter M. Groffman6, Sujay S. Kaushal7, Mike Langland5, Dennis Low5, Dorothy Merritts8, J. Thad Scott9, Elise Striz10 and Robert Walter8, (1)Western Ecology Division, USEPA, National Health and Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, (2)US Geological Survey, Baltimore, MD, (3)Groundwater and Ecosystem Restoration Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK, (4)Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK, (5)U.S. Geological Survey, New Cumberland, PA, (6)Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY, (7)Department of Geology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, (8)Earth and Environment, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA, (9)Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, (10)US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK
Background/Question/Methods: Historic land-use change can reduce water quality by impairing the ability of stream ecosystems to efficiently process nutrients such as nitrogen.  We present study results from streams affected by urbanization, quarrying, agriculture, and impoundments in the Chesapeake Bay watershed in Maryland and Pennsylvania, USA.  Our objectives were to identify patterns among biogeochemistry, microbiology, geology, and hydrology in order to identify effective nutrient management practices for impaired streams.

Results/Conclusions: Results showed that chemistry and hydrology were related spatially and temporally at the groundwater/surface-water interface.  Water table fluctuation controlled subsurface redox conditions which dictated nitrogen dynamics.  Low water tables due to reduced stream flow created redox conditions that were more conducive to microbial removal of nitrogen.  Multiple, corroborating measurements of microbial activity confirmed that subsurface sediments were actively removing nitrate nitrogen, especially when more organic carbon was available for microbial respiration.  Mass spectrometry results suggested that removal of nitrate in ground water via denitrification was limited by carbon availability and that relatively small inputs of organic carbon corresponded to large reductions in ground water nitrate, especially where agricultural inputs of nitrogen were high.  Prehistoric wetland sediments buried due to historic land use and mill dam impoundments, were significantly better able to support denitrification.  Collectively, our results suggest that management practices that can increase organic carbon availability to microbes, increase ground water residence times, and expose buried wetland sediments may improve the nitrogen removal capacity of impaired streams.